Authors

Totok Haryanto

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Sulardjaka

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Agus Suprihanto

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Abstract

Reducing the structural weight of heavy-duty mining trailers is an effective strategy for improving payload capacity, fuel efficiency, and overall operational productivity. Although topology optimization has been widely applied to lightweight structural design, its industrial implementation is often constrained by the generation of complex geometries that are difficult to manufacture using conventional fabrication processes. This study proposes a manufacturing-constrained topology optimization approach for the web flange subframe of a 90 m³ side dump trailer, aiming to achieve weight reduction while preserving structural integrity and fabrication feasibility. A 3D finite element model of the subframe was developed in SolidWorks Simulation using the actual operational loading conditions of the trailer. Baseline static analysis was first performed to identify regions with low material utilization, followed by topology optimization to determine the optimal material distribution. The optimized topology was subsequently reconstructed into a manufacturable design by reducing the flange plate thickness from 12 mm to 10 mm in non-critical regions while maintaining continuous load paths around the axle mounting zones. A secondary finite element analysis was conducted to validate the redesigned structure under identical loading conditions. The optimized design reduced the subframe mass from 1,805.57 kg to 1,613.29 kg, corresponding to a weight reduction of 10.6%. Although the maximum Von Mises stress increased from 26.0 MPa to 46.4 MPa, the redesigned structure maintained a satisfactory factor of safety of 7.54, remaining well below the material yield strength. The proposed approach demonstrates that integrating topology optimization with manufacturing-oriented reconstruction provides a practical and production-ready lightweight design solution for heavy-duty mining trailers, offering improved structural efficiency without compromising safety or manufacturability.

Keywords

Topology optimization finite element analysis lightweight design web flange subframe side dump trailer manufacturing-constrained design.

Citation of this Article

Totok Haryanto, Sulardjaka, & Agus Suprihanto. (2026). Lightweight Design of a 90M³ Side Dump Trailer Web Flange Subframe Using Manufacturing-Constrained Topology Optimization. International Current Journal of Engineering and Science (ICJES), 5(8), 13-19. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/ICJES/2026.508002 

Licence Copyright (c) 2026 International Current Journal of Engineering and Science. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence.

References

  1. Wood, J., & Cebon, D. (2017). Material selection and structural optimisation for lightweight truck trailers. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 74(1), 23-45.
  2. Kilic, M., & Topaç, M. M. (2019). Topology Optimization of a Heavy-Duty Truck Chassis Under Multiple Loading Conditions. Journal of Optimization in Mechanical Engineering, 7(2), 89-102.
  3. Padhiyar, B. (2014). Optimization of truck chassis frame for weight reduction. International Journal of Future Technology and Engineering Research, 1(1), 12-21.
  4. Upadhayaya, S. (2025). Topology optimization of a ladder-frame chassis model for heavy commercial vehicles. Theseus Applied Science Reports, 12, 45-58.
  5. Agarwal, G., & Sitembu, S. (2022). Structural analysis of heavy motor vehicle chassis frame and design optimization. SAGE Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 42(3), 204-215.
  6. Wang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Research and experimental verification of an efficient subframe lightweighting method integrating SIMP topology. MDPI Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8192.
  7. Kumar, R., & Singh, M. (2021). Weight optimization of heavy-duty truck chassis using response surface method. ScienceDirect Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 1045-1052.
  8. SolidWorks Corporation. (2024). SolidWorks Simulation User Guide – Finite Element Analysis and Topology Optimization. Dassault Systèmes.
  9. Cavazzuti, M., 4 Baldini, A., Bertocchi, E., & Dumont, N. (2011).High-performance automotive chassis design: a topology optimization approach. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44(1), 45-57.
  10. Charles, T. R., & Dev, K. J. (2017). Finite element analysis of automotive chassis with various cross-sections under static loading. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 231(8), 1112-1124.
  11. Zhou, H., & Liu, L. (2024). Topology optimization and model fusion reconstruction of concrete pump truck boom structure. SAGE Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 238(4), 1300-1311.
  12. Harrison, P., &Cebon, D. (2013). Effects of web and flange thickness on bending stiffness of commercial vehicle chassis frames. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 20(2), 154-168.
  13. Fadhil, M. H. (2024). Optimizing structural safety and thickness reduction in heavy transport trailer frames. Journal of Mechanical Structural Analysis, 19(2), 88-97.
  14. Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Multi-objective topology optimization of commercial vehicle subframes considering fatigue life. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 24(3), 411-422.
  15. Chen, Y., & Wang, T. (2021). Lightweight design of heavy trailer components using evolutionary structural optimization. Thin-Walled Structures, 162, 107532.
  16. S. Slavov and M. Konsulova-Bakalova, “Optimizing weight of housing elements of two-stage reducer by using the topology management optimization capabilities integrated in SOLIDWORKS: A case study,” Machines, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.3390/machines7010009.
  17. Takahashi, R., & Sato, H. (2022). Stiffness evaluation and mass reduction of heavy-duty trailer mainframes via FEA. Journal of Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 80(5), 589-601.