Authors Elavarasan GM.Tech (Power Electronics), Scholar at Prasad Engineering College, Jangaon, Warangal, Telangana, India Abstract Implementing machine learning (ML) models in production settings can present numerous challenges, mainly due to the intricate nature of workflows, the need for smooth integration, and the demand for scalability. This study proposes a comprehensive strategy to address these issues by integrating Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) principles with the computational power and flexibility of AWS EC2. The suggested system provides a complete ML pipeline for predicting wine quality, encompassing phases such as data ingestion, validation, preprocessing, model training, evaluation, and deployment, all within an automated end-to-end workflow. Notable features of the pipeline include a modular architecture with configuration management supported by YAML files, which allows for adjustments to meet changing project requirements. Furthermore, it integrates strong experiment tracking and model version control via MLflow, enhancing reproducibility and traceability throughout the ML lifecycle. By implementing continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) practices, the pipeline reduces manual intervention and increases operational efficiency. This research addresses critical challenges, such as ensuring data quality, optimizing resource use, and facilitating real-time model monitoring. Leveraging AWS EC2 for deployment provides the scalability needed to manage large datasets and ensures that the pipeline is prepared for real-world applications. Detailed insights into system design, implementation, and optimization underscore the practicality of MLOps in bridging theoretical concepts with production-ready ML systems. This research offers a scalable, flexible, and effective framework for developing and deploying ML workflows, along with practical strategies for future progress in the domain. Keywords Machine Learning MLOps AWS EC2 Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cloud CI/CD DevOps Citation of this Article Elavarasan G. (2025). A Fully Automated Machine Learning Pipeline for Predicting the Quality of Wine. International Current Journal of Engineering and Science (ICJES), 4(9), 9-13. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/ICJES/2025.409002 Licence Copyright (c) 2026 International Current Journal of Engineering and Science. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence. References Lwakatare. 2020. DevOps for AI - Challenges in Development of AI-enabled Applications. (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.23919/SoftCOM50211.2020.9238323.Cedric Renggli, Luka Rimanic, Nezihe Merve Gürel, Bojan Karlaš,Wentao Wu, and Ce Zhang. 2021. A Data Quality-Driven View of MLOps.1 (2021), 1–12. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.07750.Michael D. Myers and Michael Newman. 2007. The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001.Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, Jon Kern, Brian Marick, Robert C. Martin, Steve Mellor, Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, and Dave Thomas. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. (2001).Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13, 1 (1990), 3–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593.Behrouz Derakhshan, Alireza Rezaei Mahdiraji, Tilmann Rabl, and Volker Markl. 2019. Continuous deployment of machine learning pipelines. Adv. Database Technol. - EDBT 2019-March, (2019), 397–408. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5441/002/edbt.2019.35.Jane Webster and Richard Watson. 2002. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1.1.104.6570.Willem Jan van den Heuvel and Damian A. Tamburri. 2020. Model-driven ml-ops for intelligent enterprise applications: vision, approaches and challenges. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52306-0_11.Bojan Karlaš, Matteo Interlandi, Cedric Renggli, Wentao Wu, Ce Zhang, Deepak Mukunthu Iyappan Babu, Jordan Edwards, Chris Lauren, Andy Xu, and Markus Weimer. 2020. Building Continuous Integration Services for Machine Learning. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min. (2020), 2407–2415. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403290.Antonio Molner Domenech and Alberto Guillén. 2020. Ml-experiment: A Python framework for reproducible data science. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1603, 1 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1603/1/012025.Lwakatare. 2020. From a Data Science Driven Process to a Continuous Delivery Process for Machine Learning Systems. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 12562 LNCS, (2020), 185–201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_12.Leonardo Leite, Carla Rocha, Fabio Kon, Dejan Milojicic, and Paulo Meirelles. 2019. A survey of DevOps concepts and challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. 52, 6 (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359981.Martin Rütz. 2019. DEVOPS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Inf. Softw. Technol. (2019).Ulrike Schultze and Michel Avital. 2011. Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Inf. Organ. 21, 1 (2011), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.11.001.Barbara Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, David Budgen, Mark Turner, John Bailey, and Stephen Linkman. 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51, 1 (2009), 7–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.